Continuous Improvement vs. Continual Improvement
Most organizations implementing lean principles today
do not in fact practice “continuous improvement”. What they practice would be
better termed “continual improvement”. The distinction between continual
improvement and continuous improvement is a fine but important one. Continuous
means “without interruption” while continual means “frequent, repeated or
seemingly without interruption”. Continuous is “go go go…” while continual is
“start stop start stop start…” Continual improvement is far better than no
improvement at all but it is far from world class and not the aim of lean.
In practical terms you can think of an alarm clock
ringing and ringing without interruption as continuously ringing. Hitting the
snooze button of a ringing alarm clock only to have it start ringing again
later that morning and then hitting the snooze button again, would be an
example of a continually ringing alarm clock. If the alarm clock did not go off
at all and we could sleep in that may be ideal, just as it may be good to take
a break from kaizen on some days so that ideas and energies can be refreshed.
Neither continuous improvement nor continual improvement implies that we spend
every waking (no sleeping) moment doing kaizen.
For some reason many organizations implement lean from
the middle of the organization outwards. One possible reason is that the
sponsorship from lean is at middle or senior management rather than the very
top of the organization. This creates the need to implement lean as a series of
projects led by lean experts rather than a transformation led by a fully
engaged leadership and management team. These projects may be very successful. Often,
they are designed to demonstrate how lean systems will deliver specific desired
business results. But projects have scopes and boundaries and by definition are
discrete or at best continual and not continuous activities.
Kaizen events break projects down into a more frequent
and repetitive series of rapid improvement activities. I know many good
companies who have “continuously” been running kaizen events month after month
for over a decade. But I am skeptical that relying chiefly on kaizen events
represents true continuous improvement. Combined with projects that look across
an entire site or value stream, kaizen event-driven lean implementation can
greatly accelerate change. The glue that holds these kaizen activities and
events together and makes continuous improvement possible is the practice of
kaizen as part of daily management.
Kaizen in daily management includes everything from
managers finding teaching moments with their subordinates as they make their
walks through the gemba, to team leaders helping team members develop
complaints into problem statements into root cause analysis exercises and
implemented suggestions, to the engineer or manager running to the red Andon
lamp and making a rapid response to problems that have been identified and
escalated.
In other words, continuous improvement is not about
the exciting, high-energy kaizen events and high-impact lean implementation
projects but all about the sometimes-boring grind that gets us through the day.
The good news is that there’s plenty of it for all of us. If that doesn’t get
you up in the morning there’s always continual improvement for you.
0 टिप्पणियाँ